Seems our favorite Army Mechanic is shilling for TM9 paints.
"CCKW ENGINE ENAMEL
Postby Ben Dover » Mon Dec 27, 2010 6:11 am
TM9 SEMI-GLOSS OLIVE DRAB Munitions Can Paint is still the closest to being "spot-on" for your CKW engine. It matches NOS WWII OD engine sheetmetal parts perfectly. The paint from the civilian GM restoration paint vendors is not as close."
I find this odd. He's NOW SAYING that a CCKW engine is the same color as .30 cal ammo cans? I have many orignal .30 cal ammo cans from WWII (a few with the date of repack slip under the cardboard
http://www.42gpw.com/ammocan/slip.html and THIS is supposed to be the 'new wet olive'?
FIrst, its a documented FACT that GMC engine color paint is available that MEETS EXACT FACTORY SPECS.
Second, this is the same guy who posted that CCKW oil filter are orange.
(see above post)
Third, this guy has not once posted any supporting documentation EVER. Not one picture, not one independent source, not one anything to back up his claims.
Fourth, please see this post:
"Post by joel gopan » Wed Nov 28, 2007 10:10 pm
GMC had it's own factory shade of Olive color in the 40s. Army Depots or Arsenals usually painted them the going shade of Olive Drab for the period.. The 24087 SG OD seems to match up with the rebuilds in my lifetime. 270s from Europe will be many colors, REOME and ERGMA can be Lime Green, Red, or Dark Green, some 270 rebuilds from Norwegian surplus haver been gray.
Jim Carter sells GMC Olive color engine.Paint."
I'm not saying he's wrong.. but other than post whoring on the web sites (I had to boot him of this one) he has not done one thing other than tell stories that no one can research and verify.
WAY TO MANY Chevy/GMC civvy truck owners are telling me the same thing.. the GMC olive color that's being sold is dead on for late 30's. 40's, 50's and early 60's inline 6 cylinder engines produced by GMC.
I have used TM9 blue drab paint. I thinks its a tad dark, but oh well.
I have the GMC Olive paint on order, and will be spraying a valve cover and will post the results.
Please don't take these posts out of context.. I don't dislike the guy.. I've never met him. I do think that he is doing nothing more than muddying the waters though. I am not 100% correct all the time... but I post my info plain as day and its out there for all to see. If I'm wrong, so be it, but I then try to back up the correct information with research to prove that it is correct.
Sad part is the list of things that Gopan/Dover/WWIITruck has been corrected on by hard facts and TM documentation is getting longer and longer. In a way thats a GOOD THING. It makes our trucks that much better. But the downside is that Gopan/Dover/WWIITruck is putting out misinformation that has no basis or documentation, and it put the CCKW into an 'US vs. THEM' mentality becuase my correcting him all the time appears to be like an attack, when in fact it is nothing more than research.
I do hope that Gopan/Dover/WWIITruck finds a way to back up his claims as I have.